Best AI Tools Affiliate Programs 2026: Data-Driven Rankings
Every ai tools brand we track — 65 brands across 105 listings on 6 networks
This is the entire field, straight from our database: 105 program listings from 65 brands across 6 networks. 47 are ghosts — live programs publishing no performance data — shown greyed so you can see the whole market, or hidden with one click. Type to filter; click any column to sort.
| Program | Network | Market | EPC | Commission | Cookie | Conv. | Reversal |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Leonardo.Ai | flexoffers | US | $3.51 | 48% | — | — | — |
| INTERACTIVE LINK PTE. LTD. | impact | — | $2.44 | 20% | — | — | — |
| Notta AI Notetaker | impact | — | $2.11 | 30% | — | — | — |
| Linguix | awin | US | $1.81 | — | 90d | 8.88% | — |
| OpenArt AI | skimlinks | IN/GB/US +1 | $0.58 | 20% | 28d | 4.01% | 13.7% |
| Leonardo.Ai | impact | — | $0.56 | 60% | — | — | — |
| Foxy.ai | impact | — | $0.28 | 30% | — | — | — |
| Kling AI | impact | — | $0.25 | 25% | — | — | — |
| Skywork AI | skimlinks | Global | $0.19 | 20% | 2d | 5.12% | — |
| WaveSpeedAI | impact | Global | $0.16 | 10% | 400d | — | — |
| Landbot | flexoffers | US | $0.13 | 16% | — | — | — |
| DomoAI | cj | — | $0.12 | 30% | — | — | — |
| OpenArt AI | impact | — | $0.08 | 20% | — | — | — |
| Akool Inc | skimlinks | Global | $0.07 | 30% | — | 1.34% | — |
| Pippit AI - Powered by CapCut Affiliate Program | impact | — | $0.06 | 15% | — | — | — |
| ArcadeXR | impact | — | $0.05 | $1 | — | — | — |
| Join Notta’s partner program | skimlinks | Global | $0.05 | 30% | — | 0.81% | — |
| Sider | impact | — | $0.04 | 15% | — | — | — |
| PopAi | impact | — | $0.01 | 35% | — | — | — |
| QuillBot | skimlinks | US | $0.01 | 13.2% | 6d | 0.28% | 13.1% |
| QuillBot | flexoffers | US | $0.01 | 12% | — | — | — |
| OpenArt AI | flexoffers | US | $0 | — | — | — | — |
| FreedomGPT | awin | US | — | — | 90d | — | — |
| Ghostwriter Express | awin | US | — | — | 30d | — | — |
| HeyReal.AI | impact | — | — | 40% | — | — | — |
| PixelShadow Inc. | awin | US | — | — | 45d | — | — |
| clipflyai | awin | US | — | — | 30d | — | — |
| AI for Interior Designers | impact | — | — | 20% | — | — | — |
| AI-ChatPro : Accédez à tous les top modèles IA en un clic | skimlinks | FR | — | — | — | — | — |
| AdCreative.ai | skimlinks | FR | — | — | — | — | — |
| AdCreative.ai | flexoffers | US | — | 24% | — | — | — |
| AiPower | skimlinks | CA/US | — | — | — | — | — |
| Akool Inc | impact | — | — | 30% | — | — | — |
| Akool Inc | flexoffers | US | — | — | — | — | — |
| Arcade Studio, Inc | impact | — | — | 4% | — | — | — |
| Architechtures | skimlinks | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Blogify | skimlinks | US | — | — | — | — | — |
| Blogify | impact | — | — | 80% | — | — | — |
| BypassPen AI | impact | — | — | 40% | — | — | — |
| Castmagic | skimlinks | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Castmagic | flexoffers | US | — | 24% | — | — | — |
| Chai AI | impact | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Colossyan | skimlinks | Global | — | — | — | — | — |
| Colossyan | impact | — | — | 25% | — | — | — |
| Colossyan | flexoffers | US | — | 20% | — | — | — |
| ConversioBot | impact | — | — | 50% | — | — | — |
| Creao AI Limited | skimlinks | Global | — | — | — | — | — |
| Deepgram | flexoffers | US | — | 16% | — | — | — |
| Designs.ai by Pixlr Pte Ltd | impact | — | — | 20% | — | — | — |
| Duckbill | impact | — | — | $5 | — | — | — |
| ESTsoft | cj | — | — | 15% | — | — | — |
| EssayDone - AI Writer & Humanizer | skimlinks | Global | — | — | — | — | — |
| EssayDone - AI Writer & Humanizer | impact | — | — | 50% | — | — | — |
| Flowith | flexoffers | US | — | — | — | — | — |
| Gizmo AI | skimlinks | US | — | — | — | — | — |
| HeyReal.AI | mavely | — | — | 28% | — | — | — |
| Homture- Amazon Seller- America | impact | — | — | 10% | — | — | — |
| IFLYTEK | flexoffers | US | — | — | — | — | — |
| INTERACTIVE LINK PTE. LTD. | skimlinks | Global | — | — | — | — | — |
| Inmagine Lab Pte. Ltd. | skimlinks | Global | — | — | — | — | — |
| Iternal Technologies | skimlinks | Global | — | — | — | — | — |
| Iternal Technologies | cj | — | — | 20% | — | — | — |
| JoggAI Affiliate Program | impact | — | — | 30% | — | — | — |
| KiloClaw Partner Program | skimlinks | Global | — | — | — | — | — |
| Kimba | skimlinks | US | — | — | — | — | — |
| Kindo AI | impact | — | — | 5% | — | — | — |
| LUMISTAR | skimlinks | Global | — | — | — | — | — |
| Linguix | skimlinks | US | — | — | — | — | — |
| Murf AI | flexoffers | US | — | 16% | — | — | — |
| My AskAI | skimlinks | GB | — | — | — | — | — |
| My AskAI | flexoffers | GB | — | 24% | — | — | — |
| My AskAI | impact | — | — | 30% | — | — | — |
| Myclaw | skimlinks | Global | — | — | — | — | — |
| Notta AI Notetaker | flexoffers | US | — | — | — | — | — |
| OiiOii | skimlinks | Global | — | — | — | — | — |
| OpenArt AI | mavely | — | — | 14% | — | — | — |
| PhotoPacks.AI | flexoffers | US | — | 4% | — | — | — |
| Pippit AI - Powered by CapCut Affiliate Program | flexoffers | US | — | — | — | — | — |
| Pippit Many GEOs | skimlinks | Global | — | — | — | — | — |
| PopAi | flexoffers | US | — | — | — | — | — |
| Promptly | impact | — | — | 20% | — | — | — |
| Readdy | flexoffers | US | — | — | — | — | — |
| RecCloud | skimlinks | Global | — | — | — | — | — |
| RecCloud | impact | — | — | 20% | — | — | — |
| RecCloud | flexoffers | US | — | — | — | — | — |
| Replika | impact | — | — | 40% | — | — | — |
| SensOn AI | skimlinks | US | — | — | — | — | — |
| Sider | skimlinks | Global | — | — | — | — | — |
| Sider | mavely | — | — | 10.5% | — | — | — |
| Sider | flexoffers | US | — | — | — | — | — |
| Skywork AI | impact | — | — | 20% | — | — | — |
| Skywork AI | flexoffers | US | — | — | — | — | — |
| SoundHound AI | impact | — | — | 10% | — | — | — |
| StealthWriter Program | impact | — | — | 20% | — | — | — |
| Suno | impact | — | — | 25% | — | — | — |
| VINCITORI BV | skimlinks | NL | — | — | — | — | — |
| Verdent | skimlinks | Global | — | — | — | — | — |
| Vida Global Inc. | skimlinks | US | — | — | — | — | — |
| Vozo App | AI Talking Video Generator | impact | — | — | 25% | — | — | — |
| WaveSpeedAI | skimlinks | Global | — | — | — | — | — |
| WaveSpeedAI | flexoffers | US | — | — | — | — | — |
| clipflyai | skimlinks | US | — | — | — | — | — |
| enso | flexoffers | US | — | 40% | — | — | — |
| iFLYTEK | skimlinks | US | — | — | — | — | — |
| 株式会社デジタルレシピ + ネットでバズリ中!AIがキャッチコピーを自動作成して無限のアイデアを生み出す「Catchy」(22-0809) | skimlinks | — | — | — | — | — | — |
† Sense check: value is far outside the vertical's norm — usually a small-sample or data-entry artifact on the network side. Verify in the network dashboard before relying on it.
The AI tools affiliate category is young, fast-moving, and — by the numbers — still largely opaque. Of the 105 program listings we track across six networks, 47 report no EPC at all, a ghost rate of 45% that dwarfs most established verticals. Yet within the 22 programs that do report earnings data, the spread is dramatic: Leonardo.Ai on FlexOffers shows a $3.51 EPC against a 48% commission rate (the highest verifiable figure in the category), while INTERACTIVE LINK / Readdy.ai on Impact shows a $2.44 EPC against a 20% commission rate. The vertical median positive EPC sits at just $0.13.
What the data reveals is a two-tier category. A handful of programs — AI advertising tools, AI transcription services, and AI hardware — are generating measurable conversion activity. The majority exist as passive network listings, collecting clicks with no verifiable return. Commission rates are generous on paper, averaging 23.9% where disclosed, but a headline percentage on a low-price SaaS subscription is a different proposition from 23.9% on a $150 hardware purchase. This report separates the two and gives you the numbers to judge each program on its actual merits.
Detailed Analysis
Top AI Tools Affiliate Programs Reviewed
AdCreative.ai
FlexOffersUSAdCreative.ai appears in our database on FlexOffers and Skimlinks, but neither listing reports an EPC — so despite the brand's prominence, there is no verifiable earnings figure to rank it on. The platform is an AI-powered advertising creative generation tool used by startups, e-commerce businesses, and marketing agencies to improve ad conversion rates.
The programme exists across two networks: FlexOffers (US, 24%) and Skimlinks (FR, no performance data). For affiliates seeking a confirmed commission percentage, FlexOffers at 24% is the more workable entry point, though it carries no EPC data of its own. Content targeting advertising professionals, paid social practitioners, or performance marketing blogs is the natural fit.
Leonardo.Ai
FlexOffersUSLeonardo.Ai presents one of the more interesting data puzzles in this vertical. On FlexOffers it shows a $3.51 EPC at 48% commission. On Impact, the same brand shows a $0.56 EPC but a higher 60% commission rate. Neither listing discloses a cookie duration, and neither reports conversion rate or reversal data. The $3.51 EPC on FlexOffers is flagged as a likely outlier — a significantly higher figure than the vertical median of $0.13 — and should be verified in the network dashboard before building campaigns around it. The disparity between the two network EPCs ($3.51 versus $0.56) for the same underlying product is itself a signal of low traffic volume on at least one of them.
Leonardo.Ai provides generative AI tools for artists, designers, and content creators. It has a free tier and paid subscriptions, which is a favorable structure for affiliates: the free tier reduces friction at the top of the funnel, while the paid plans generate the commissionable event. The 60% commission rate on Impact, if the conversion rate is meaningful, would represent the higher earning per sale. Any affiliate running a test should track conversions at the network level rather than relying on the aggregated EPC until the data stabilises.
Readdy.ai (INTERACTIVE LINK PTE. LTD.)
ImpactReaddy.ai — listed on Impact under the corporate name INTERACTIVE LINK PTE. LTD. — is an AI website builder that lets users describe a site and have it generated instantly, without drag-and-drop interfaces. The product targets small teams without design resources and agencies seeking faster delivery workflows. The $2.44 EPC at 20% commission places it second in the vertical by reported EPC, and unlike the program above it, its figure sits within a plausible range given the product's price point. A Skimlinks listing for the same brand reports no EPC or commission data, confirming that Impact is the active programme to join.
No conversion rate or reversal data is available, which limits the ability to assess consistency. Commission terms on Impact describe a range of 20% to 40% on online sales, suggesting tiered or performance-based rates — a detail worth confirming in the dashboard before projecting earnings. Content targeting no-code tooling, AI-powered web development, or small agency workflows is the most direct route. The absence of a disclosed cookie window is a gap worth querying with the programme manager.
Notta.ai (Notta Memo)
ImpactNotta.ai offers AI-powered transcription and summarisation for professionals and students. The Impact listing (branded as "Notta Memo") shows a $2.11 EPC at 30% commission. The Skimlinks listing for the same product provides supporting context: a $21.24 average basket, a 0.81% conversion rate, and $0.05 EPC at 30% commission. These two sets of figures are not directly comparable — Impact and Skimlinks aggregate different traffic pools — but together they sketch a product with a moderate basket value and a lower-single-digit conversion rate.
Both networks list the same 30% commission rate, so per-sale commission comes down to basket size rather than rate. Yet the Impact EPC of $2.11 is far higher than Skimlinks' $0.05 — suggesting that Impact's traffic is better qualified, or that its data covers a different product tier. The productive approach is to run a small traffic test on each network and compare actual conversion performance before committing to one. Transcription and note-taking content targeting remote workers, students, or podcast producers is the natural promotional context.
Plaud US
SkimlinksUSPlaud US is the strongest data-complete programme in this vertical. Unlike the EPC-leaders above, Plaud reports five of eight key metrics on Skimlinks: a $0.49 EPC, 4.04% conversion rate, $150.85 average basket, 7.7% reversal rate, and a 29-day cookie. Plaud makes AI-powered voice recorders and note-taking hardware — physical devices, not software subscriptions — which explains the higher basket value. At 8% commission on a $150.85 average order, each successful referral earns approximately $12.07 before reversals. The 4.04% conversion rate is solid and consistent with a well-defined product with genuine consumer demand.
The 7.7% reversal rate is the one area to watch. For a physical product, reversals typically indicate returns, which hardware is more susceptible to than digital goods. That rate is not alarming — it amounts to roughly one return in thirteen sales — but it should be factored into earnings projections. A campaign generating 1,000 clicks at 4.04% conversion and 7.7% reversal would produce approximately 37 net completed sales, earning around $447 in commission. Content targeting professionals seeking better meeting notes, students, or audio journalists will find the product self-explanatory.
OpenArt AI
SkimlinksGlobalOpenArt AI is one of only two programmes in the vertical to report a reversal figure at all: 13.7% on Skimlinks across the reporting period. Combined with a 4.01% conversion rate — above the vertical's generally sparse benchmarks — it is a programme with genuine, if imperfect, conversion activity. The average basket of $21.94 is modest, reflecting the low-price subscription model typical of consumer AI creative tools. At 20% commission, each average conversion earns approximately $4.39 before reversals. The $0.58 EPC is below the flagging threshold and sits within a credible range for this basket size and conversion rate.
OpenArt AI also appears on Impact (20% commission, $0.08 EPC) and Mavely (14% commission, no EPC). The Skimlinks terms are superior on every measurable dimension: higher commission, higher EPC, and the only listing that reports full performance data. The product covers AI image generation from text prompts and serves a global market including the Netherlands, India, Portugal, Thailand, Spain, the United States, Lebanon, Turkey, Germany, and Canada. Content in English targeting digital artists, social media creators, or AI art communities is the natural promotional context.
Foxy.ai
ImpactFoxy.ai offers AI content creation tools specifically designed for Instagram and social platform creators. The Impact programme pays 30% commission on both initial and recurring subscriptions — a structure that, if subscribers are retained, compounds earnings over time in a way that a one-time commission never does. The $0.28 EPC is within a plausible range for a consumer creative tool at this commission level. No conversion rate, reversal rate, basket size, or cookie duration data is reported, which limits confidence in projections.
The recurring commission structure is the programme's defining feature. An affiliate who generates 100 paying subscribers at even a low monthly plan value of $10 would earn $300 per month in recurring commissions, provided those subscribers stay active. Whether Foxy.ai's product retention is sufficient to make this realistic is not verifiable from the network data — that requires direct enquiry with the programme manager, or testing. The social-media-creator angle is a well-defined content niche with strong intent signals, and Instagram monetisation content tends to attract engaged audiences.
Walter Writes AI
AwinUSWalter Writes AI occupies a specific corner of the AI writing market: a tool that helps students, journalists, and creators produce content that reads as human-written rather than AI-generated. The Awin listing shows a $0.21 EPC and a 2.30% conversion rate, with a 30-day cookie. No commission rate is disclosed by Awin, and no basket size or reversal data is available. The combination of a 2.30% conversion rate and $0.21 EPC implies an average commission of approximately $9.13 per converting visitor — consistent with a low-to-mid-price writing subscription.
This is a single-network listing with limited data, which constrains confidence. The product category — AI writing humanisers — is one that has attracted regulatory and academic scrutiny, and promotional content in this niche should be written carefully to avoid implying any particular use case that could create reputational risk for the affiliate. That said, legitimate use cases such as improving readability, varying sentence structure, and assisting non-native English writers are well-established, and content targeting these audiences is appropriate.
What About ChatGPT, Gemini, Copilot, and Claude?
The largest AI brands by consumer usage — OpenAI (ChatGPT), Google (Gemini), Microsoft (Copilot), and Anthropic (Claude) — do not appear in our affiliate network database. None of the six networks we track carries a formal affiliate programme for any of these four platforms. This is not an oversight in our data collection: as of our August 2026 database, these companies distribute their consumer products through direct subscription and enterprise contracts rather than affiliate channels.
This is consistent with the distribution strategy of large-platform AI products, which typically rely on brand recognition and organic growth rather than performance-based publisher partnerships. The absence of commission data makes it impossible to verify performance, and we do not list programmes we cannot evaluate. Separately, Replika (the AI companionship app with over 35 million reported users) does carry a listing on Impact at 40% commission, but reports no EPC data, placing it in the ghost-programme category. SoundHound AI similarly appears on Impact with a 10% commission but no performance metrics. Grammarly — a widely recommended AI writing assistant — is not present in our current database under these category filters, though it may appear under adjacent SaaS categories.
Cross-Network Data
Same Brand, Different Networks: Where to Get the Best Deal
Many AI tools brands in our database appear on two or more networks simultaneously, sometimes with meaningfully different commission rates. The network with the higher EPC is not always the same as the one with the higher headline commission — an important distinction when planning a campaign. Here are six of the most instructive cross-network cases.
Leonardo.Ai
Notta.ai
OpenArt AI
My AskAI
AdCreative.ai
Colossyan
Data Insights
AI Tools Affiliate Programs: What the Data Shows
Three patterns emerge clearly from the 65 programs in our database. First, the category is dominated by ghost programs: 47 of 105 listings (45%) report no EPC. This is the highest ghost rate of any vertical we currently track, and it reflects the category's immaturity as an affiliate channel rather than weak underlying demand for AI tools. Many of these programs joined networks in 2024 or 2025 and have not yet accumulated sufficient traffic to generate a meaningful EPC figure.
Second, where performance data does exist, the spread is extreme. The 21 programs with positive EPC data range from $0.01 (QuillBot on Skimlinks, PopAi on Impact) to $3.51 (Leonardo.Ai on FlexOffers). The vertical median positive EPC is $0.13 — a low figure that reflects a category with many low-priced consumer subscription products generating a small commission per sale. The average positive EPC of $0.60 is skewed sharply upward by the outlier top rows.
Data Insight: The Cookie Desert
Only 9 of the 105 programme listings in this vertical report a cookie duration. The average of those 9 is 80 days, but that figure is skewed by WaveSpeedAI's 400-day cookie on Impact — which is far outside any normal commercial range and warrants verification. Strip that out and the remaining eight programmes average 40 days. For a category where the purchase decision often involves product trials and comparison shopping over days or weeks, a cookie that expires within the trial period is a structural earnings risk. Ask programme managers for their cookie policy before committing traffic.
Data Insight: The Reversal Risk Is Concentrated
Only two programmes in the vertical report reversal data. Of those, QuillBot on Skimlinks stands out: a 13.1% reversal rate against an EPC of just $0.01. At that combination, every eighth sale is reversed, on a programme already generating sub-penny earnings per click. QuillBot's 0.28% conversion rate is the lowest in the vertical by a wide margin, suggesting that the traffic reaching the Skimlinks listing is poorly matched to the product. The only other programme reporting reversals — OpenArt AI on Skimlinks, at 13.7% — pairs that with the category's most reliable, if modest, performance data.
Data Insight: Commission Rate Does Not Predict EPC
The correlation between headline commission rate and EPC is weak in this vertical. Blogify on Impact advertises an 80% commission on the first subscription — the highest in the category — but reports no EPC. ConversioBot on Impact lists a 50% commission rate with no EPC. In contrast, Leonardo.Ai on FlexOffers earns a $3.51 EPC on a 48% commission, while the same brand on Impact earns only $0.56 despite a higher 60% commission — the higher headline rate does not translate into higher earnings per click. Commission percentage is only one variable in the earnings equation; average basket and conversion rate determine the rest.
Browse all 65 AI tools affiliate programs with EPC data, commission rates, and cross-network comparisons.
Search All ProgramsHow to Choose an AI Tools Affiliate Program
The single most useful filter in this category is whether the programme reports an EPC at all. With 45% of listings carrying no performance data, the first decision is whether to promote a ghost programme based on commission rate alone, or restrict campaigns to the minority of programmes with verifiable earnings metrics. The latter is the lower-risk approach: a 30% commission on a product that generates no measurable EPC is not a statement about the product's quality — it may simply be that the network listing is too new or too lightly trafficked to produce a reliable figure — but it is a statement about the data available to inform your campaign.
Among programmes with EPC data, apply the same underlying analysis that applies to any affiliate category: what is the average basket size, and what is the realistic conversion rate for your specific audience? A hardware programme illustrates this clearly. A single-digit commission sounds low relative to the 30-40% rates common elsewhere in the category, but a large basket on a physical device can make each conversion worth several dollars. A programme paying 30% on a $10 subscription produces just $3 per conversion. Commission percentage without basket context is almost meaningless.
Finally, treat the recurring commission claim — present in several programmes here, including Foxy.ai and ConversioBot — with scrutiny. Recurring commissions are valuable if subscriber retention is high, but many early-stage AI tools see significant churn as users evaluate products during free-trial periods and then lapse. Verify with the programme manager what percentage of referred subscribers actually convert to paying plans, and how long they typically remain active, before building long-term revenue projections around recurring structures.
FAQ
Frequently Asked Questions
What are the best AI tools affiliate programs?
The programs with the strongest verifiable EPC data are Leonardo.Ai on FlexOffers ($3.51 EPC, 48% commission), INTERACTIVE LINK / Readdy.ai on Impact ($2.44 EPC, 20% commission), and Notta AI Notetaker on Impact ($2.11 EPC, 30% commission). For programs with fuller data sets, OpenArt AI on Skimlinks offers a $0.58 EPC backed by a 4.01% conversion rate, while Skywork AI on Skimlinks shows a 5.12% conversion rate. The right choice depends on your audience and the type of content you produce.
How much commission do AI tools affiliate programs pay?
Across the 56 programs in our database that report a commission rate, the average is 23.9%. Rates range from 4% (PhotoPacks.AI on FlexOffers) to 80% (Blogify on Impact for the first subscription). SaaS and subscription-based tools tend to pay higher percentage commissions than physical-good programs, reflecting the low marginal cost of an additional digital subscriber. However, the headline percentage means little without knowing the average subscription value.
Why is the ghost rate so high for AI tools programs?
Of the 105 AI tools program listings in our database, 47 (45%) report no EPC at all. Several factors explain this. Many AI tool companies are early-stage and joined affiliate networks recently, so their traffic volume is too low to produce a statistically meaningful EPC. Others exist on Skimlinks as passive merchant listings rather than actively managed programs, meaning clicks are sparse. A high ghost rate signals that the category is still maturing as an affiliate channel.
Which network is best for AI tools affiliate programs?
Impact hosts the most AI tools program listings in our database and tends to offer the clearest commission documentation. Skimlinks provides the most complete performance data — EPC, conversion rate, reversal rate, and average basket — for the programs it covers, which makes it the most useful network for benchmarking. Awin carries a small number of listings but produced the highest reported EPC in the category. FlexOffers carries some notable names including Leonardo.Ai and QuillBot.
What cookie duration should I expect from AI tools programs?
Cookie data is missing for most programs in this category — only 9 of 105 listings report a cookie duration. Of those, the average is 80 days, though this is skewed upward by WaveSpeedAI's 400-day cookie on Impact, which we flag as an outlier requiring verification. More representative programs offer 28-30 days (OpenArt AI, Ghostwriter Express, clipflyai). Skywork AI's 2-day cookie is the shortest recorded and is a material consideration for any content campaign.
Do any AI tools programs pay on recurring subscriptions?
Several programs in the category explicitly structure commissions on subscriptions. Foxy.ai on Impact pays 30% on both the initial and each recurring subscription — a compounding structure worth noting for retained customers. ConversioBot on Impact pays 50% across its entire product funnel. Blogify on Impact pays 80% on the first subscription. How "recurring" is actually implemented varies by network and program; always read the commission terms in the network dashboard before promoting.
Methodology
This analysis covers 65 AI tools affiliate programs tracked across 6 networks including Skimlinks, Awin, FlexOffers, CJ, Impact, and Mavely. Performance data (EPC, conversion rate, reversal rate) is pulled from network APIs and updated regularly. Commission rates reflect default publisher tiers — negotiated rates may differ. Programs with no performance data ("ghost programs") are excluded from averages but included in total counts. Vertical median EPC is calculated across positive-EPC rows only. Outlier flags apply where EPC exceeds $3.00 (the higher of $3 absolute or 10x the vertical median positive EPC of $0.13). Last updated: August 28, 2026.