Best Email Marketing Affiliate Programs 2026: Data-Driven Rankings

Every email marketing brand we track — 71 brands across 119 listings on 7 networks

This is the entire field, straight from our database: 119 program listings from 71 brands across 7 networks. 56 are ghosts — live programs publishing no performance data — shown greyed so you can see the whole market, or hidden with one click. Type to filter; click any column to sort.

† Sense check: value is far outside the vertical's norm — usually a small-sample or data-entry artifact on the network side. Verify in the network dashboard before relying on it.

Email marketing software is one of the more data-sparse corners of the affiliate world. Of the 71 programs we track across seven networks, 47% publish no earnings per click, no commission rate, and no conversion data. The headline average EPC of $0.49 is pulled almost entirely by a handful of outliers — a CRM tool on Awin, two high-EPC tools on Impact and FlexOffers — while most of the field sits below $0.50 per click or shows no data at all.

The category spans three overlapping product types: pure email marketing tools (Mailchimp, Constant Contact, AWeber, Sender), marketing automation platforms with email as a channel (Brevo, HubSpot, Klaviyo, GetResponse), and CRM software where email is a feature (Pipedrive, HoneyBook, Close). Commission structures differ accordingly: standalone email tools tend to pay flat amounts per trial-to-paid conversion; automation platforms offer recurring percentages on the customer's subscription; CRM programs often mix flat leads with percentage-of-ARR structures. This diversity makes apples-to-apples comparisons hazardous, and raw commission rates particularly misleading — a 160% commission figure is in our data, explained in detail below.

This report focuses on the programs where network data is sufficient to support a meaningful comparison. We cover the eight top performers in depth, identify where the same brand appears on multiple networks at materially different terms, and flag the household names that run programs while disclosing almost nothing about performance.

Top Email Marketing & CRM Affiliate Programs Reviewed

What About HubSpot, Mailchimp, GetResponse, and ActiveCampaign?

These are the names a reader would expect to see at the top of any email marketing affiliate list. The reality from our data is more complicated.

HubSpot appears on both Impact ($0.53 EPC, 30% commission) and FlexOffers ($0.05 EPC, 32% commission). The tenfold EPC difference between two listings for the same product is notable — it likely reflects different traffic quality and content placement rather than a programme design difference. HubSpot's affiliate programme is real and active, but the EPC figures suggest most referral traffic converts at a low rate on both networks, consistent with a product that requires a longer evaluation cycle. The brand recognition is substantial and reduces friction in recommendation content, but the numbers indicate it rewards patience over volume.

Mailchimp runs three separate CJ listings — a US programme ($0.36 EPC), an international programme ($0.08 EPC, 40% commission), and a Canadian programme ($0.03 EPC, 40% commission). The US listing has the best verified EPC in our data for the brand. There is also a Skimlinks listing ($0.34 EPC, 43.7% commission). The variation between the US and international CJ programmes ($0.36 vs $0.08) is large enough that affiliates should actively verify which programme their traffic qualifies for.

GetResponse appears on four networks — CJ ($0.29 EPC), FlexOffers (32% commission, no EPC), Skimlinks (ghost), and Mavely (ghost). The CJ listing is the only one with a verified EPC. The FlexOffers listing's 32% commission and absence of EPC data means there is no basis for comparing the two active listings on performance rather than stated rate. GetResponse is a well-established platform serving global markets; the CJ programme is the most transparent entry point.

ActiveCampaign does not appear in our database under any network match for this vertical. The brand runs its own direct affiliate programme outside the networks we track. If you are building email marketing content, verify current terms on ActiveCampaign's own site, as network-reported data does not exist in our dataset.

AWeber appears on CJ ($0.01 EPC) and Skimlinks (ghost). The CJ listing does not publish a commission rate at the network level. The near-zero EPC of $0.01 is the real signal here — it means that at current traffic-to-conversion rates, the programme generates almost nothing per referred click on average. AWeber has been in the market for over two decades and has strong name recognition, but the EPC reflects its current competitive position.

Same Brand, Different Networks: Where Terms Diverge

Several brands in this vertical run programmes on multiple networks simultaneously, often with meaningfully different commission rates, EPC, and cookie terms. Choosing the right network for a given brand can materially affect your earnings. Here are the most significant examples from our data.

Data Insights: What the Numbers Actually Show

The email marketing and CRM affiliate category has a wider EPC distribution than almost any other SaaS vertical in our database. The top entry (Groupmail Ltd., $11.69) is 40 times the median positive EPC of $0.29. In most verticals the ratio between the top and median is closer to 10×. This extreme spread is almost entirely a function of flat-rate commission structures colliding with variable traffic quality and small measurement windows rather than a genuine difference in programme quality.

Cookie duration is effectively invisible in this vertical. Only 15 of 71 programmes disclose a cookie window at all. The 15 that do range from 15 days (MailPoet on Skimlinks) to 90 days (FreshService on Awin). The majority of programmes on Impact and FlexOffers publish no duration, which means affiliates have no basis for estimating what fraction of delayed conversions they are capturing. This is a data gap that disproportionately disadvantages affiliates doing research-stage content, where readers may return days or weeks after the first visit.

The reversal rate picture is sparse. Only one programme in the current data reports a reversal figure: MailPoet on Skimlinks at 38.4%. The absence of reversal data across the rest of the field is not evidence of low reversals — it simply means the networks are not reporting the figure. In SaaS, subscription cancellations within a validation window (typically 30–90 days after billing) are the primary reversal trigger; programmes with free trials that convert to paid are particularly exposed if the trial-to-paid conversion does not hold.

The ghost rate of 47% (programmes with no EPC, commission, or conversion data) is above the cross-vertical average in our database. Skimlinks contributes the most ghost listings by volume — it aggregates programmes from merchant networks that may have no active affiliate publishing activity. Before spending time on a Skimlinks-listed programme with no data, verify it is accepting new publishers inside the Skimlinks dashboard.

How to Choose an Email Marketing Affiliate Programme

The first question is whether your audience buys email tools for themselves or evaluates them on behalf of a business. Solo creators and solopreneurs respond to affordability and ease-of-use narratives (Sender, MailPoet, Constant Contact); marketing managers and technical buyers at SMBs respond to integration depth and deliverability data (Klaviyo, Brevo, HubSpot). The same product description will not convert both audiences.

Second, understand the commission structure before the rate. A 100% commission sounds better than a $50 flat rate until you learn the 100% applies to the first month of a $9 starter plan. Read the commissions table in the network dashboard, not just the headline rate. Our data includes notes on payout triggers — ManyChat's 100% commission on Impact, for instance, applies to the subscription purchase with $0 for a free signup.

Third, assess the cookie duration relative to your content type. If you write bottom-of-funnel comparisons where the reader arrives with purchase intent, a short cookie window may lose you only a small fraction of conversions. If you write top-of-funnel awareness content, a 75-day window (Constant Contact on Impact) is significantly more valuable than a 30-day window because a material fraction of your readers will convert weeks later.

Fourth, treat flat-rate commissions with more caution than the EPC headline suggests. A large flat rate for Klaviyo is only profitable if your audience has genuine enterprise e-commerce intent — a personal finance blog sending warm traffic to a Klaviyo landing page will have a conversion rate close to zero regardless of the EPC figure in our table.

Finally, look at data completeness as a quality signal. Programmes that publish EPC, conversion rate, cookie duration, and reversal rate are almost always more active and better managed than those that publish nothing. Our data shows a clear correlation: the programmes in this vertical with multiple verified metrics (MailPoet, Mailchimp) are operating as genuine affiliate channels; programmes with no data are more likely to be dormant listings.