CompareEPC
231
Brands
$0.40
Avg EPC
7.5%
Avg Commission
40d
Avg Cookie
42%
Ghost Rate
The complete list

Every luxury fashion brand we track — 231 brands across 339 listings on 8 networks

This is the entire field, straight from our database: 339 program listings from 231 brands across 8 networks. 142 are ghosts — live programs publishing no performance data — shown greyed so you can see the whole market, or hidden with one click. Type to filter; click any column to sort.

339 shown
ProgramNetworkMarketEPCCommissionCookieConv.Reversal
PERRIN PARISawinUS$29.69—30d12.5%—
David Peck (DPP Productions LLC)awinUS$14.75—30d50%—
SongmontawinUS$8.14—30d18.9%—
Keith JamesawinUS$7.5—30d16.67%—
Henrik Vibskov Boutique (US)awinUS$5.4—30d6.18%—
www.tokyo-tiger.comimpact—$418%———
State of Cotton NYCawinUS$3.3—30d5.17%—
Tiger and the MonkeyawinUS$2.81—30d10%—
Johanna OrtizawinUS$2.62—30d0.85%—
Hanro USskimlinksUS$2.2612%19d10.63%29.4%
ALEXANDER DAASawinUS$2.16—30d5.3%—
Kinshipcj—$1.97%———
STAND OILawinUS$1.78—30d11.78%—
The RealRealflexoffersUS$1.770.8%———
Afewvibe LTDawinUS$1.68—30d4.91%—
Julian FashionskimlinksGlobal$1.3420.2%4d0.68%0%
Fashiontamers USawinUS$1.29—30d16.67%—
NaghediawinUS$1.25—60d4.86%—
ORIANE 1986 LLCawinUS$1.17—30d0.68%—
Palm AngelsflexoffersIT$1.1210%———
Jamie HallerawinUS$1.09—30d1.07%—
Lusso LeatherawinUS$1—30d6.66%—
Colleen AllenskimlinksUS$0.8512%—0.36%—
Kiana GhavidelawinUS$0.81—30d0.69%—
Paul & Sharkimpact—$0.88%———
Centre PieceawinUS$0.66—30d2.08%—
Club 21skimlinksGlobal$0.6615%2d1.14%41%
Siegelman StableawinUS$0.62—30d6.15%—
Dolce & GabbanaskimlinksGlobal$0.5914.7%11d0.65%27.5%
Cosette di AmesawinUS$0.58—90d2.97%—
Divo BoutiqueskimlinksIT$0.5610%—3.55%17.9%
KinshipskimlinksGlobal$0.557%—0.99%—
NomaseiawinUS$0.51—45d0.26%—
Alexandre BirmanskimlinksUS$0.499.7%11d1.47%33.7%
www.tokyo-tiger.comskimlinksGlobal$0.4912.7%24d9.12%—
LN-CCflexoffersGB$0.4910%———
Kinetix Casual LuxuryawinUS$0.48—15d2.38%—
The RealRealimpact—$0.461%———
TRES BIENcj—$0.425%———
Fleur Sauvage DesignawinUS$0.42—90d0.96%—
Clementine SleepwearawinUS$0.41—60d0.78%—
Alexander WangskimlinksGlobal$0.45.7%16d3.06%29.8%
SugarskimlinksGlobal$0.388%27d1.67%7.8%
COUTRflexoffersUS$0.37————
Sid Neigum Designs IncawinUS$0.36—90d0.65%—
Consigned Sealed Delivered (CSD) Authenticated Luxury Fashion ConsignmentskimlinksGB/US$0.3412%—0.16%—
armani.comskimlinksGlobal$0.3411.1%17d1.61%7.5%
Hunting SeasonawinUS$0.33—30d0.22%—
L'ExceptionskimlinksFR$0.335.8%29d3.98%—
AVIANAYA LLC DBA JournelleawinUS$0.32—30d2%—
Colleen AllenawinUS$0.31—30d0.07%—
FEATUREimpact—$0.315%———
Grayman and CompanyawinUS$0.3—60d1.09%—
Maison Margiela ITskimlinksJP$0.311.8%14d0.66%11.4%
FformeskimlinksUS$0.2925%—0.11%—
Roberto CavalliflexoffersBE$0.2810%———
LERET LERETawinUS$0.26—90d0.28%—
Palm AngelsskimlinksGlobal$0.2610%3d1.17%24.3%
Shrimps LondonskimlinksGB/US$0.2610%2d2.4%22%
commandoawinUS$0.26—30d1.31%—
Senser UKflexoffersGB$0.26————
Emma J Shipley USawinUS$0.25—30d1.08%—
Julian Fashion DEflexoffersDE$0.230.8%———
Designer RevivalawinUS$0.22—7d1.07%—
THE LISTimpact—$0.225%———
Gomez.roflexoffersRO$0.26.4%———
Gaudenzi srlawinUS$0.2—30d0.26%—
Noblemars IncawinUS$0.2—30d0.11%—
THE GREAT.awinUS$0.2—1d0.75%—
TERI JONawinUS$0.19—90d0.28%—
GIABORGHINIskimlinksIT/US$0.185%—1.6%—
Jac + JackskimlinksAU$0.187%29d1.51%11%
SavetteawinUS$0.18—7d0.08%—
Tessabit.comskimlinksGlobal$0.1715%—0.5%55.3%
KatroawinUS$0.16—30d0.21%—
Senser USflexoffersUS$0.151.6%———
The WebsterflexoffersUS$0.156%———
Off-WhiteflexoffersIT$0.1412%———
DAVEK UMBRELLASawinUS$0.13—30d1.56%—
Hayley Menzies USawinUS$0.13—30d0.22%—
Gomez HUflexoffersHU$0.136.4%———
Loretta Caponi (US)skimlinksUS$0.1210%—0.19%—
Flannels UKflexoffersGB$0.11.2%———
GiglioskimlinksGlobal$0.17%1d0.32%21.5%
PissenlitawinUS$0.09—90d0.31%—
The ListflexoffersUS$0.094%———
Alexander Wang CAflexoffersCA$0.08————
ALT SWIMawinUS$0.08—60d0.46%—
ANDREA IYAMAHawinUS$0.08—30d0.15%—
CARRIE DUNHAMawinUS$0.08—30d0.99%—
Streets Ahead IncawinUS$0.08—90d0.17%—
TessabitflexoffersUS$0.088%———
Montret (US)awinUS$0.07—30d1.82%—
Misela USawinUS$0.06—30d14.29%—
Roberto CavalliskimlinksGlobal$0.067.9%13d0.39%43.1%
Tessabit (UK)flexoffersGB$0.058%———
DUCIEawinUS$0.05—90d0.14%—
MME.MINKawinUS$0.05—15d0.08%—
Off-WhiteskimlinksGlobal$0.059.1%10d0.24%34.3%
The LoyalistawinUS$0.05—30d0.11%—
TIPA.EUcj—$0.044%———
Guess BRskimlinks—$0.048.4%—0.73%74.6%
MARAISskimlinksAU$0.0410%—0.16%1.9%
The Luxury ClosetskimlinksGlobal$0.044.9%1d0.39%3.9%
Tessabit.comcj—$0.0410%———
EraldoskimlinksGlobal$0.037.5%—0.29%78.2%
IRFEskimlinksCA/US$0.0315%—0.46%—
Jane and Tash BespokeawinUS$0.03—30d0.04%—
TRADE LUX ITALIA SRLawinUS$0.03—60d0.08%—
VALICOflexoffersIT$0.0316%———
FEATUREflexoffersUS$0.0313%———
Paul StuartflexoffersUS$0.021.6%———
Orchard MileskimlinksUS$0.023%—0.16%23.8%
VermillionawinUS$0.02—90d0.22%—
Farfetch LATAMflexoffersCO$0.021.2%———
Alexander Wang DEflexoffersDE$0.02————
LOLA BoutiqueawinUS$0.01—90d0.06%—
Raishmaskimlinks—$0.015%—0.11%—
Bergdorf GoodmanflexoffersUS$0.011.6%———
Julian Fashion AUflexoffersAU$0.01————
The Luxury Closetcj—$0.017.7%———
italist UKflexoffersGB$09.6%———
Armani INTflexoffersNL$04.8%———
Alexander Wang FRflexoffersFR$0————
CSD.shop UKflexoffersGB$010%———
Giglio.com GlobalflexoffersGB$06.4%———
6397awinUS——30d——
AERON Zrt.awinUS——30d——
AGAATIawinUS——30d——
ASHLYNawinUS——60d——
Alyson EastmanawinUS——30d——
Andreu's Luxury ClosetawinUS——90d——
Anima Costiera USawinUS——30d——
AurotiawinUS——90d——
BENEawinUS——45d——
Bellemere New York LimitedawinUS——90d——
BessetteeawinUS——30d——
Bluebird Creative, LLCawinUS——15d——
C2H4awinUS——30d——
DallasDesignerHandbags LLCawinUS——15d——
Desislava GilberteawinUS——30d——
FformeawinUS——90d——
GhurkaawinUS——30d——
Gianine BikiniawinUS——90d——
Heidi Wynne LLCawinUS——15d——
High Sport USawinUS——30d——
Hommegirls USawinUS——30d——
ItalistawinUS——30d——
Joan Oloff ShoesawinUS——90d——
KENZOawinUS——15d——
Karl Lagerfeld (US)awinUS—8%45d0.37%—
KatrussawinUS——30d——
LASATEX IND SRL - RO30843642awinUS——30d——
LOPALUawinUS——60d——
La Vie Style HouseawinUS——30d——
Lingua Franca NYCawinUS——365d——
Loretta Caponi (US)awinUS——30d——
Luli FamaawinUS——15d——
Luxe House of CoutureawinUS——30d——
Luxury HeirsawinUS——30d——
Maison CommonawinUS——30d——
Maison du MaillotawinUS——45d——
MarysiaawinUS——30d——
Nicole MillerawinUS——90d——
No EmotionsawinGB——30d——
Nuulee NYCawinUS——30d——
One Off BoutiqueawinUS——30d——
PORTOawinUS——30d——
PRISCAVera (US)awinUS——30d——
Palm Beach SandalsawinUS——90d——
Prota FiroriawinUS——30d——
RVNG Couture (US)awinUS——30d——
RebootawinUS——45d——
Repeat Atlanta Online (US)awinUS——30d——
SPM International LLCawinUS——90d——
SVARIANawinUS——30d——
SellenesawinUS——30d——
Seymone (US)awinUS——30d——
Shannon BondawinUS——30d——
Silvia TcherassiawinUS——30d——
THE LISTawinUS——90d——
TINA Stephens (US)awinUS——30d——
Teressa FogliaawinUS——60d——
The Lady BagawinUS——30d——
Thierry LasryawinUS——30d——
TootsiesawinUS——15d——
Trimar Fashion LLCawinUS——30d——
Veronika Vilim (US)awinUS——30d——
Violante NessiawinUS——30d——
VêtirawinUS——30d——
WARDROBE.NYC USawinUS——30d——
WARP USawinUS——15d——
WeldenawinUS——30d——
carmina US Inc.awinUS——1d——
daana saakenaawinUS——90d——
my style srlawinUS——60d——
24S Worldwide (APAC/EU/US)rakutenGlobal—————
ALLUimpact——3%———
Afewvibe LTDflexoffersUS—————
Alembika.comskimlinksCA/US—————
Alembika.comcj——8%———
Alexander WangflexoffersUS—4%———
Alexander Wang INTflexoffersGlobal—————
Alexander Wang KRflexoffersKR—————
Atelier New YorkrakutenAU—1%———
Balmain Fashion GlobalrakutenGlobal—————
Bergdorf Goodmanmavely——2.1%———
Bottega VenetarakutenGB—11.5%———
Brand ClothesskimlinksCH—————
BreficomskimlinksIT—————
C2H4skimlinksUS—————
COUTRskimlinksGlobal—————
CSD USflexoffersUS—10%———
Cappelen Dimyrcj——10%———
Casablanca ParisrakutenGlobal—————
Cashmereuimpact——10%———
Cettirepartnerize——5%———
Club21flexoffersAU—12%———
Club21rakutenAU—15%———
Coltorti Boutique EUflexoffersDE—6.4%———
Country Attireimpact——5%———
DOORS NYCimpact——10%———
DOORS NYCskimlinksUS—————
DUCIEflexoffersUS—————
Dante 5skimlinksGlobal—————
Dante 5rakutenAF—7%———
Darveysmavely——0.7%———
DarveysrakutenUS—1%———
David PeckskimlinksUS—————
Deliberti ITskimlinksIT—————
Divo Boutiqueimpact——10%———
EraldoflexoffersUS—5%———
EraldorakutenAF—6%———
EtrorakutenAU—8%———
FENDI USrakutenUS—————
Farfetchmavely——7%———
Farfetch BRrakutenBR—4%———
Franz KralerskimlinksIT—————
GIGLIO.COM s.p.a (Global)rakutenAU—5%———
GiglioflexoffersUS—————
Givenchy CouturerakutenGlobal—————
GuccirakutenUS—————
HIGH FRskimlinksFR—————
Henrik Vibskov Boutique (US)skimlinksUS—————
Hirshleifersimpact——6%———
IN.FAME 1 LIMITEDimpact——10%———
IRFEcj——15%———
Italian-Design.nlskimlinksNL—————
ItalistskimlinksGlobal—————
Italist USflexoffersUS—————
Julian FashionrakutenGlobal—————
Julian Fashion CAflexoffersCA—————
KatrussskimlinksUS—————
Keith JamesskimlinksUS—————
KenzoskimlinksGlobal—————
Kiana GhavidelskimlinksUS—————
Kinetix Casual LuxuryskimlinksUS—————
Kinshipmavely——4.9%———
Kristof Buntinx Fashion and Designimpact——15%———
LN-CCmavely——3.5%———
LN-CCpartnerize——7%———
LUISAVIAROMA.COMmavely——7%———
La Bella Stella Incimpact——2%———
La MartinaflexoffersFR—8%———
LeamskimlinksGlobal—————
LeamflexoffersUS—7.2%———
LeamrakutenAU—9%———
Libas CollectiveflexoffersAE—5%———
Luxury Loft - Designer Mode online shoppenskimlinksDE—————
MME.MINKskimlinksUS—————
Maison Margiela UAEskimlinksAE—————
Maison VictorioskimlinksIT—————
Marais AUrakutenAU—8%———
Marco CerulloskimlinksIT—————
Michele Franzese Modaskimlinks——————
Misela USskimlinksGB—————
ModaselleskimlinksCA/US—————
ModaselleflexoffersCA—————
Montret (US)skimlinksUS—————
Mozzafiatomavely——7%———
Nicchia Luxury ITskimlinksIT—————
Némès Paris (FR)skimlinksFR—————
OTHERimpact——10%———
Off-Whitemavely——3.5%———
One Off Boutiqueskimlinks——————
Ounasspartnerize——6%———
Palm Angelsmavely——3.5%———
Paul & SharkflexoffersIT—————
Paul Stuartimpact——5%———
Rachel GilbertskimlinksAU/NZ—————
RboutiqueskimlinksGlobal—————
RboutiqueflexoffersUS—4.8%———
RboutiquerakutenAU—6%———
RebootskimlinksUS—————
Reebonz UKflexoffersGB—4%———
Rene CaovillaflexoffersIT—————
Repeat Atlanta Online (US)flexoffersUS—————
Robert MarcskimlinksUS—————
Robert Marccj——2%———
Roberto Cavallimavely——2.8%———
SSENSEmavely——0.7%———
SSENSE GLOBALrakutenGlobal—————
Santa EulaliarakutenAU—5%———
Shannon BondskimlinksUS—————
State of Cotton NYCskimlinksUS—————
SugarrakutenAU—8%———
SymbolskimlinksGlobal—————
Symbolimpact——6%———
Symbol CPS UAskimlinks1 regions—————
T.LUXYskimlinksGB—————
TESSABIT (US) - Beat srlrakutenAU—10%———
THE LISTmavely——7%———
TIPA.EUskimlinksCZ +1—————
TRES BIENskimlinksGlobal—————
Tessabitmavely——7%———
Tessabit (UK) - Beat srlrakutenAU—10%———
The ApartmentskimlinksGlobal—————
The ApartmentrakutenAF—7%———
The ApartmentflexoffersUS—————
The Luxury ClosetflexoffersUS—6%———
The Luxury Closetmavely——5.4%———
The Luxury ClosetrakutenAU—5%———
The Sam Opuzi Collectionskimlinks——————
The WebsterrakutenUS—1.5%———
The Webstermavely——5.6%———
The White Marketsimpact——————
VALICOrakutenUS—9.5%———
Valdora ABskimlinksGlobal—————
ValentinorakutenAU—8%———
Veronika Vilim (US)skimlinksUS—————
Versace - GlobalrakutenGlobal—————
Wanan Luxury FRflexoffersFR—5%———
italistmavely——12.6%———
italist UKrakutenAU—8%———
italist USrakutenAU—4.5%———
www.tokyo-tiger.comflexoffersUS—————
株式会社サークラックス + ルイ・ヴィトンなどブランド通販なら【ギャラリーレア公式】(19-0426)skimlinks——————
株式会社JUSTY + ブランド品買取専門 【古着com】(17-0905)skimlinks——————
株式会社K─ブランドオフ + ブランド品の宅配買取サービス専門店【リクロ】(22-1130)skimlinks——————

† Sense check: value is far outside the vertical's norm — usually a small-sample or data-entry artifact on the network side. Verify in the network dashboard before relying on it.

Luxury fashion presents an unusual affiliate proposition: commissions are often generous on paper, average basket sizes vary widely, and brand recognition is high. Yet the data exposes a category riddled with reversal traps, sparse performance metrics, and a handful of programs where the headline commission rate is undercut so sharply by returns that the real payout bears little resemblance to what was advertised. Dolce & Gabbana on Skimlinks carries a 14.7% commission and a 27.5% reversal rate. Off-White on the same network reverses 34.3% of tracked orders.

We analyzed 231 luxury and designer fashion programs across eight networks to find the programs where the numbers hold up. The top of the field is thinner than in most categories: only a handful of programs clear the $3.00 EPC threshold, and they carry outlier flags due to limited sample data. Below that tier, Club 21, Alexander Wang, and Armani provide the most complete performance pictures, with verified basket sizes, conversion rates, and reversal data from Skimlinks. This report is structured around what the data actually says, not what brand cachet implies.

Detailed Analysis

Top Luxury Fashion Affiliate Programs Reviewed

LN-CC

FlexOffersGB
EPC
$0.49
Commission
10%
Cookie
—
Conv. Rate
—
Reversal
—
Avg Basket
—

LN-CC is a London-based luxury multi-brand retailer carrying established and emerging designers across menswear and womenswear. Its $0.49 EPC on FlexOffers arrives with no conversion rate, no basket size, and no reversal data alongside it. This pattern — an EPC on FlexOffers in the absence of supporting metrics — typically reflects a small number of high-value transactions rather than a consistently converting program. The figure should be treated as a ceiling estimate, not an operational baseline.

The more analytically useful framing is the cross-network picture. LN-CC also runs on Partnerize at 7% and Mavely at 3.5%, with neither listing any EPC. The FlexOffers 10% commission is the strongest rate available. If your audience skews toward niche designer fashion and you can generate qualified referrals, LN-CC at 10% on a high-AOV sale is worth testing — but confirm real performance data inside the network dashboard before building a campaign around the headline EPC figure.

Best for: Fashion bloggers and luxury lifestyle content creators with a UK or international designer-fashion audience

tokyo-tiger.com

ImpactSkimlinks
EPC (Impact)
$4.00
Commission (Impact)
18%
EPC (Skimlinks)
$0.49
Conv. (Skimlinks)
9.12%
Cookie (Skimlinks)
24d
Avg Basket (Skimlinks)
—

Tokyo Tiger sells contemporary fashion with a focus on specialty sizing, and it is one of two programs in this vertical with cross-network data worth examining directly. The $4.00 EPC on Impact is flagged as an outlier, consistent with limited-sample behavior. The Skimlinks data provides a more grounded picture: $0.49 EPC and a 9.12% conversion rate. That conversion rate is genuinely strong — among the highest in the vertical among programs with confirmed EPC data — but the Skimlinks EPC stays modest, which points to a low average basket despite the healthy conversion.

The 18% commission on Impact is the highest published rate in this vertical. If the Impact EPC is representative of real performance at scale, the program would comfortably lead the category. The Skimlinks 12.7% commission, 24-day cookie, and 9.12% conversion rate suggest the core offer converts well; the question is basket size. Content driving higher-AOV transactions would shift the economics substantially. Zero reversal data on Skimlinks is worth noting as an information gap rather than a positive signal.

Best for: Fashion content creators targeting specialty-size audiences and contemporary design enthusiasts

Kinship

CJ
EPC
$1.90
Commission
7%
Cookie
—
Conv. Rate
—
Reversal
—
Avg Basket
—

Kinship is a curated luxury retailer carrying Loro Piana, Goyard, Ralph Lauren, and similar heritage brands, offering free global express shipping and a 14-day refund policy. The $1.90 EPC on CJ is among the higher figures in this vertical and sits below the $3.00 outlier threshold, which adds confidence to the figure. CJ does not publish conversion rate, basket size, or reversal data for this program, which limits further analysis. The 7% commission is competitive for a multi-brand luxury retailer.

Kinship also runs on Mavely at 4.9%, making CJ the clearly superior rate for standard publisher activity. The brand's positioning — aspirational heritage names, global shipping — aligns well with a high-intent luxury audience. A $1.90 EPC at 7% implies a healthy average commission yield per click that converts, consistent with a high-AOV basket at a modest conversion rate. Both assumptions are plausible for this brand tier. Affiliates targeting readers who research high-end gifting or investment wardrobe purchases are well placed here.

Best for: Affiliates focused on heritage luxury and investment-wardrobe content; high-AOV gifting content

The Webster

FlexOffersUS
EPC
$0.15
Commission
6%
Cookie
—
Conv. Rate
—
Reversal
—
Avg Basket
—

The Webster is an established US luxury multi-brand boutique stocking Chloe, Givenchy, and comparable designer labels for women and men. Its $0.15 EPC on FlexOffers sits below the $3.00 flag threshold. FlexOffers pays 6% and is the top available commission for this program. Mavely offers 5.6%, Rakuten 1.5%. The commission differential makes FlexOffers the logical default unless network-specific performance data suggests otherwise.

The absence of conversion rate and basket data constrains full analysis, and the modest EPC suggests limited transactional volume at current traffic levels. The Webster's retail positioning — curated US luxury boutique with editorial credibility — suits affiliates who publish long-form fashion editorial, seasonal edit content, or designer gift guides. The US-focused market means traffic outside North America should be tested before significant promotional investment.

Best for: US-focused luxury fashion blogs and editorial content sites covering designer collections and seasonal edits

Club 21

SkimlinksGlobal
EPC
$0.66
Commission
15%
Cookie
2 days
Conv. Rate
1.14%
Reversal
41%
Avg Basket
—

Club 21 is one of the more analytically complete programs in this vertical with a sub-$1 EPC. The Skimlinks data shows a 1.14% conversion rate and a 15% commission — producing a reported EPC of $0.66. The 41% reversal rate is severe and materially undercuts the headline commission. The 2-day cookie is a further weakness: it requires that referred visitors convert quickly, which is a material constraint for considered luxury purchases where the research and decision cycle often extends beyond a couple of days.

The Skimlinks listing ships globally and provides the only performance evidence for Club 21. The 15% commission looks competitive on paper, but once the 41% reversal rate is priced in the net return is far lower than the headline suggests. For affiliates embedding editorial links in luxury fashion round-ups, Club 21's short cookie and high reversal rate warrant conservative projections rather than a default placement.

Best for: Luxury fashion blogs publishing round-ups featuring established designer labels; editorial affiliates using Skimlinks

Alexander Wang

SkimlinksGlobal
EPC
$0.40
Commission
5.7%
Cookie
16 days
Conv. Rate
3.06%
Reversal
29.8%
Avg Basket
—

Alexander Wang on Skimlinks pairs a strong conversion rate with a heavy reversal profile: 29.8% reversal, a 3.06% conversion rate, and a 5.7% commission producing a $0.40 EPC. The 3.06% conversion is well above the vertical median, but the 29.8% reversal rate erodes a large share of attributed sales, so projections should be built on the net figure rather than the headline conversion. The 16-day cookie is a reasonable window for the brand's audience.

Alexander Wang also runs on FlexOffers at 4%, which is lower than the Skimlinks 5.7%. The FlexOffers listing carries no EPC data. For affiliates already on Skimlinks, the data case for that network is clear. The brand — known for urban-luxury aesthetics with a younger, style-led customer base — suits affiliates whose content reaches readers who purchase designer fashion direct rather than through multi-brand platforms. The combination of verified conversion data and a full Skimlinks metric set makes this one of the more measurable entries in the vertical, provided the reversal rate is priced in.

Best for: Style-focused affiliates with audiences interested in contemporary luxury; direct-brand fashion content

armani.com

SkimlinksGlobal
EPC
$0.34
Commission
11.1%
Cookie
17 days
Conv. Rate
1.61%
Reversal
7.5%
Avg Basket
—

Armani.com on Skimlinks is the only major heritage luxury house in this vertical with a complete, multi-metric data profile. The 1.61% conversion rate, 11.1% commission, and 7.5% reversal rate combine to produce a consistent, calculable return of around $0.34 EPC as reported. The 17-day cookie is among the longer windows in this vertical and accommodates the deliberate purchase journey common to a brand at this tier.

The FlexOffers listing for Armani International shows a 4.8% commission with no performance data — well under half the Skimlinks rate, and without the evidential support to justify using it as a primary placement. The Skimlinks data is the operative benchmark here. For affiliates covering established luxury fashion, Armani provides global reach, genuine brand recognition, and a reversal rate that does not undermine the commission. The program reflects the breadth of Armani's product range from entry-level accessories through main-line apparel.

Best for: Luxury lifestyle and fashion content targeting a global audience familiar with heritage Italian design

Deliberti IT

AwinIT
EPC
—
Commission
—
Cookie
—
Conv. Rate
—
Reversal
—
Avg Basket
—

Deliberti is an Italian luxury fashion retailer recognized for its curated buyer selection, with coverage of both established and emerging Italian and European designers. Its listing currently publishes no performance data — no EPC, commission, cookie, conversion, or reversal figures accompany it — so it sits in the ghost tier despite its editorial standing. Until the network surfaces metrics, exact earnings-per-conversion calculation is impossible.

The Skimlinks listing for Deliberti carries no data at all. The Italian market focus means that any future conversion strength would likely reflect a targeted, geographically relevant audience rather than broad global traffic. Affiliates whose audiences have demonstrated interest in Italian or European luxury fashion — particularly through editorial content covering fashion week, designer profiles, or Italian craftsmanship — are best positioned to test the program once performance figures appear.

Best for: Italian luxury fashion specialists and European designer content creators

Programs with Promising Signals but Incomplete Data

Several programs sit just outside the top tier but are worth monitoring. Divo Boutique on Skimlinks converts at 3.55% with a $157 basket and 10% commission, producing a reasonable net return, but its 17.9% reversal rate requires conservative projections. MARAIS on Skimlinks shows a 0.16% conversion and a manageable 1.9% reversal rate with a 10% commission — the arithmetic is thin at this conversion rate, but it warrants a test if you cover multi-brand European luxury with high-intent traffic.

What About Gucci, Prada, Chanel, Louis Vuitton, and Burberry?

The biggest names in luxury fashion are largely absent from the data-producing tier of this analysis, and not by accident. Gucci appears in our database on Rakuten (US) with no commission, no EPC, and no performance data — a ghost listing in the fullest sense. Versace Global on Rakuten is the same: present across multiple markets, publishing nothing. Balmain Fashion Global on Rakuten: no data. Givenchy Couture on Rakuten: no data. Fendi US on Rakuten: no data. Casablanca Paris on Rakuten: no data.

The pattern is consistent. The largest luxury houses — LVMH-owned brands, Kering labels, Richemont — use affiliate program listings as a brand-control tool rather than a genuine traffic acquisition channel. A listing exists; commissions are either absent or unenforceable in practice; and any EPC or conversion data is withheld. Chanel and Hermes do not appear in our database at all, which is consistent with their longstanding policy of avoiding performance-marketing channels.

Farfetch, the multi-brand platform carrying many of these labels, is present on Mavely (7%), Rakuten Brazil (4%), and FlexOffers LATAM (1.2%), but publishes no EPC across any network. Bergdorf Goodman — a natural comparison for US luxury shoppers — shows a $0.01 EPC on FlexOffers at 1.6% commission, and a 2.1% commission on Mavely with no EPC. The data gap for the brands with the greatest consumer recognition is one of the defining structural features of this vertical.

Cross-Network Data

Same Brand, Different Networks: Choosing the Right Listing

Luxury fashion is one of the most fragmented verticals for network distribution. Many brands maintain listings on four or more networks simultaneously, with commission rates that can differ by a factor of four. Here are the clearest cases from our data.

LN-CC

FlexOffers (Best Rate + EPC)
$0.49
10% commission · Cookie —
Partnerize
—
7% commission · Cookie —
Mavely
—
3.5% commission · Cookie —

Off-White

FlexOffers (Best EPC)
$0.14
12% commission · Cookie —
Skimlinks (Reversal data)
$0.05
9.1% commission · 10d cookie · 34.3% reversal
Mavely
—
3.5% commission · Cookie —

The Webster

FlexOffers (Best EPC)
$0.15
6% commission · Cookie —
Mavely
—
5.6% commission · Cookie —
Rakuten
—
1.5% commission · Cookie —

Roberto Cavalli

FlexOffers (Best EPC)
$0.28
10% commission · Cookie —
Skimlinks (Reversal data)
$0.06
7.9% commission · 13d cookie · 43.1% reversal
Mavely
—
2.8% commission · Cookie —

Alexander Wang

Skimlinks (Best EPC + full data)
$0.40
5.7% commission · 16d cookie · 29.8% reversal
FlexOffers
—
4% commission · Cookie —

Tessabit

Skimlinks (Most data)
$0.17
15% commission · Cookie — · 0.5% conv.
Mavely
—
7% commission · Cookie —
Rakuten / CJ
—
10% commission · Cookie —

Data Insights

Luxury Fashion Affiliate Programs: What the Data Shows

The clearest finding from 231 programs and 8 networks is that commission rate and net return are poorly correlated in this vertical. Dolce & Gabbana on Skimlinks publishes a 14.7% commission rate, but a 27.5% reversal rate means the net payout after returns is under 10.7% — and the $0.59 EPC reflects this. Affiliates who sort by commission rate alone will systematically over-estimate their returns from the brands with the most prominent names.

Average basket sizes among the data-complete Skimlinks programs vary widely, spanning low-double-digit baskets at tokyo-tiger.com through triple-digit baskets at brands like Loretta Caponi, Off-White, Club 21, MARAIS, and Alexander Wang. Higher basket sizes do not reliably produce higher EPCs in this data set. Club 21 at a 1.14% conversion and 15% commission produces a $0.66 EPC; Off-White at 0.24% conversion and 9.1% commission produces $0.05. The conversion rate is the dominant variable.

Data Insight: The Reversal Trap

Several programs in this vertical report Skimlinks reversal rates above 24%, among them Dolce & Gabbana (27.5%), Off-White (34.3%), and Palm Angels (24.3%). In each of these three cases, the commission rate is between 9% and 14.7%. An affiliate promoting Off-White on Skimlinks at 9.1% commission and a 34.3% reversal rate is effectively working at a net rate of approximately 6.0% — before factoring in the very low 0.24% conversion. The $0.05 EPC reported by Skimlinks already reflects these returns, but affiliates who join via a network that does not publish reversal data may not discover the problem until they reconcile payments.

The ghost rate of 42% — programs with neither EPC nor commission data — is high, and it masks a broader data thinness problem. Among the programs that do publish a commission, only a minority also publish a conversion rate, and fewer still publish a basket size. The practical implication is that reliable EPC estimation is only possible for a small fraction of this vertical's programs, and that EPC-only rankings from networks that suppress conversion and reversal data should be treated with caution.

Data Insight: Network Concentration of Useful Data

Skimlinks accounts for the large majority of programs with both EPC and conversion rate in this vertical. Awin provides the next-best data completeness, with a number of programs publishing EPC and conversion rate through the network. FlexOffers contributes the most EPC-only entries. Impact, Rakuten, and Mavely each carry multiple programs with commission data but no performance metrics. For a category where reversal risk is high and basket sizes vary widely, Skimlinks' multi-metric reporting provides a materially better basis for program selection.

Cookie duration data is sparse: only a minority of the 231 programs report a cookie window. Where reported, durations include 1 day (The Luxury Closet on Skimlinks), 1 day (Giglio on Skimlinks), 2 days (Club 21 on Skimlinks), and up to 365 days (Awin programs). The 1-day cookie on The Luxury Closet is particularly constraining for a resale marketplace where buyers often research and compare before committing. That 3.9% reversal rate is low for the category, but the very short attribution window means some returning purchasers will miss the cookie entirely.

Browse all 231 luxury fashion affiliate programs with EPC data, commission rates, and cross-network comparisons.

Search All Programs

How to Choose a Luxury Fashion Affiliate Program

Start with reversal rate, not commission rate. In this vertical, the two are inversely correlated with alarming frequency. A 14.7% commission headline from Dolce & Gabbana on Skimlinks delivers a $0.59 EPC after the 27.5% reversal rate is priced in. Alexander Wang at 5.7% and a 29.8% reversal rate delivers $0.40. Commission rate tells you what you could earn on a perfect transaction; reversal rate tells you how many perfect transactions you actually get to keep. Programs without reversal data should be tested at low volume before you scale.

Evaluate cookie duration against your audience's buying behaviour. A 2-day cookie is workable for an audience that impulse-buys designer accessories after reading a post; it is inadequate for an audience that researches a £400 purchase over two weeks. Club 21's 2-day cookie is the constraint that stops it from ranking higher despite a 15% commission. If your audience's consideration cycle is long — as it typically is for high-AOV apparel — programs with 15-day or 30-day windows are structurally superior.

Match network selection to data availability. If you are testing a new program, choose the network that publishes the most metrics for that brand. Skimlinks provides the most complete data in this vertical. Awin is second. FlexOffers frequently provides higher EPCs but without conversion or reversal context, which makes it harder to project real campaign returns. Where a brand lists on multiple networks, run the commission arithmetic: the FlexOffers rate is often the highest, but not always, and the Skimlinks data allows you to model outcomes rather than guess.

Distinguish multi-brand retailers from mono-brand programs. Multi-brand platforms (Club 21, MARAIS, Kinship, Flannels) give you breadth: a single affiliate link can capture a reader who purchases from any of dozens of designers. Mono-brand programs (Armani, Alexander Wang, Off-White) require that your audience has a specific interest in that brand. The conversion rates for mono-brand programs are generally lower in this data set, but when a mono-brand converts it tends to generate a higher per-transaction commission on a more predictable basket.

Account for market geography before building content. Several programs in this vertical are restricted by market: Palm Angels and Off-White on FlexOffers list Italy as their market; Deliberti IT is Italian-focused on Awin; Roberto Cavalli on FlexOffers is Belgium-based. Sending US or UK traffic to a program optimised for another market may result in lower conversion rates or missed attribution. Check the network's market field against your audience's primary country before investing content around a program.

FAQ

Frequently Asked Questions

What are the best luxury fashion affiliate programs?

Based on our data across 231 programs and 8 networks, the strongest performers by EPC are tokyo-tiger.com ($4.00 on Impact, outlier-flagged), Kinship ($1.90 on CJ), LN-CC ($0.49 on FlexOffers), and The Webster ($0.15 on FlexOffers). For the most complete data picture — EPC, conversion rate, and reversal rate together — Club 21 on Skimlinks (15% commission, 1.14% conversion, 41% reversal) and Alexander Wang on Skimlinks (5.7% commission, 3.06% conversion, 29.8% reversal) are the most analytically measurable entries, though both carry heavy reversal rates.

How much commission do luxury fashion affiliate programs pay?

Across the luxury fashion programs in our database that publish a commission rate, the average is 7.5%. Rates range from 0.7% (Darveys on Mavely) to 18% (tokyo-tiger.com on Impact). High commission rates do not predict high returns: Dolce & Gabbana at 14.7% delivers a $0.59 EPC on Skimlinks after a 27.5% reversal rate is applied, while Alexander Wang at 5.7% delivers $0.40 with a 29.8% reversal. Commission rate is a necessary but insufficient variable for program evaluation.

What is the reversal rate problem in luxury fashion affiliate programs?

Reversal rates in luxury fashion can be significantly elevated, particularly for direct-brand programs on Skimlinks. Dolce & Gabbana reverses 27.5% of tracked orders, Off-White 34.3%, and Palm Angels 24.3%. These represent the portion of sales that are cancelled, returned, or otherwise reversed after initial attribution. Programs with reversal rates above 20% should be treated with caution: the net commission after reversals can be materially lower than the headline rate. Where reversal data is not published — as is the case for most FlexOffers and Impact listings — affiliates cannot assess this risk without running a test campaign and waiting for payment reconciliation.

Why do programs like Gucci, Prada, and Louis Vuitton publish no affiliate data?

The largest luxury houses treat affiliate programs as brand-management tools rather than performance marketing channels. Gucci (Rakuten US), Versace Global (Rakuten), Balmain (Rakuten), and Givenchy Couture (Rakuten) all appear in our database with no commission, no EPC, and no performance data. Chanel and Hermes have no listing at all. These brands have sufficient demand-side pull that they do not need to compete for affiliate traffic, and many prefer to control the consumer journey tightly to protect brand positioning. Affiliates seeking to promote these names are typically better served through multi-brand platforms (Farfetch, Bergdorf Goodman, Matches) that carry the same products with more transparent program terms.

Which affiliate network is best for luxury fashion programs?

Skimlinks provides the most complete performance data for this vertical, publishing EPC, conversion rate, basket size, and reversal rate for a meaningful proportion of its luxury fashion listings. Awin is second for data completeness. FlexOffers carries the highest EPCs in this category but rarely publishes conversion or reversal data, which limits risk assessment. Impact and Rakuten carry several significant brands but typically publish commission rates only. For a new affiliate selecting networks, starting with Skimlinks or Awin provides the most information for optimising program mix; FlexOffers is worth joining for the brands where it is the sole or highest-commission listing.

Is the luxury fashion affiliate vertical harder to convert than mass-market fashion?

In aggregate, yes, but with important exceptions. The vertical median conversion rate among programs with published data sits around 0.8%. However, Songmont on Awin converts at 18.9%, and tokyo-tiger.com on Skimlinks at 9.12%. These outliers share a common characteristic: they are platforms with targeted product offerings and price points that are aspirational rather than ultra-luxury. Programs at the true top of the luxury price spectrum — where individual items routinely exceed £500 — show conversion rates below 1%. The distinction between premium accessible luxury (average basket under $200) and true luxury (baskets above $400) is meaningful for conversion rate expectations.

Methodology

This analysis covers 231 luxury and designer fashion affiliate programs tracked across 8 networks including Skimlinks, Awin, FlexOffers, CJ, Impact, Rakuten, Mavely, and Partnerize. Programs are included where the parent brand is categorised as Luxury Fashion, Luxury, Designer Goods, or Luxury Goods within the Fashion & Apparel category. Performance data (EPC, conversion rate, reversal rate, basket size) is pulled from network APIs and dashboards; commission rates reflect default publisher tiers — negotiated rates may differ. Programs with no EPC and no commission data are classified as ghost programs; they are excluded from averages but included in totals. The 42% ghost rate reflects programs with literally no actionable data from either field. EPC outlier flags are applied where a program's EPC exceeds the greater of ten times the vertical median positive EPC or $3.00, capped at $15.00 absolute. Last updated: August 28, 2026.

Learn more about our data methodology